Ex Parte PUSCHNER et al - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2001-1556                                                        
          Application 09/333,322                                                      


          denied, 475 U.S. 1017 (1986); ACS Hosp. Sys., Inc. v. Montefiore            
          Hosp., 732 F.2d 1572, 1577, 221 USPQ 929, 933 (Fed. Cir. 1984).             
          These showings by the examiner are an essential part of complying           
          with the burden of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness.            
          Note In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444               
          (Fed. Cir. 1992).  If that burden is met, the burden then shifts            
          to the applicant to overcome the prima facie case with argument             
          and/or evidence.  Obviousness is then determined on the basis of            
          the evidence as a whole and the relative persuasiveness of the              
          arguments.  See Id.; In re Hedges, 783 F.2d 1038, 1039, 228 USPQ            
          685, 686 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472,             
          223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984); and In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d            
          1048, 1052, 189 USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976).  Only those arguments            
          actually made by appellants have been considered in this                    
          decision.  Arguments which appellants could have made but chose             
          not to make in the brief have not been considered and are deemed            
          to be waived by appellants [see 37 CFR § 1.192(a)].                         
          With respect to representative, independent claim 1, the                    
          examiner finds that LeMaire teaches the claimed invention except            
          for the teaching of a step on only one side of the connection and           
          the teaching of a chip which is physically disposed on the                  
          connection in the region of reduced thickness.  The examiner                

                                         -5-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007