The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TIMOTHY CULVER ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1569 Application No. 09/007,714 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-6, 20-23, 25 and 26.1 Claims 18 and 24 were canceled in amendment A (Paper No. 4, filed October 7, 1999) and claims 7-17 and 19 were withdrawn from consideration on page 1 of the brief. We REVERSE. 1 The examiner’s Status of Claims in the answer is correct, whereas the appellant’s STATUS OF THE CLAIMS in the brief incorrectly list claim 24 as pending in the appeal rather than canceled.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007