Appeal No. 2001-1569
Application No. 09/007,714
Since the examiner has not relied upon the teachings of Hulen to remedy the
deficiency noted above with the teachings of Bowater and we find no teaching to
remedy the deficiency, we will not sustain the rejection of dependent claims 3, 4
and 22.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 20, 21, 23,
25, and 26. under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed, and the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 3, 4, and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JLD/vsh
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007