Ex Parte BERG et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1572                                                        
          Application 08/939,569                                                      


          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.   An electronic device, comprising:                                 
               a flat flexible dielectric substrate less than 0.050 inch              
          thick and having a generally round hole of a given diameter;                
               a substantially square terminal pin having rounded corners             
          inserted into the round hole in the substrate, the square pin               
          having a given cross-dimension between opposite corners thereof             
          greater than the diameter of the round hole; and                            
               wherein the difference between the cross-dimension of the              
          square pin and the diameter of the round hole is on the order of            
          7% to 67% of the diameter of the hole                                       
               and wherein an improved electrical and mechanical interface            
          is created between the terminal pin and the flat flexible                   
          substrate in the area about said hole such that a deformed                  
          peripheral area of the flat flexible substrate applies normal               
          forces to the square pin.                                                   
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Scholz                        4,909,746          Mar. 20, 1990              
          Claims 1, 2, 4-9, 11-14 and 16-19 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers               
          Scholz taken alone.                                                         
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the             
          respective details thereof.                                                 






                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007