Ex Parte BERG et al - Page 8

          Appeal No. 2001-1572                                                        
          Application 08/939,569                                                      


          In conclusion, we have not sustained the examiner’s                         
          rejection of any of the claims on appeal.  Therefore, the                   
          decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 4-9, 11-14 and              
          16-19 is reversed.                                                          
          REVERSED                                                                    





                         JERRY SMITH                   )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         JOSEPH L. DIXON               )  BOARD OF PATENT             
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )  APPEALS AND                 
                                                      )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP         )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              







          JS/ki                                                                       





                                         -8-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007