Ex Parte EMMERT et al - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2001-1644                                                                                           
              Application No. 08/951,149                                                                                     

              2, ll. 21-24; Fig. 1).  While the significance of “viewable from the front portion” is not                     
              entirely clear to us, we interpret the recitations with respect to “viewable” as merely                        
              further limiting the recitations of structure clearly set forth in the claims -- a light guide                 
              positioned on a hinge element or in the opening of a knuckle in the housing.  Defining                         
              the position of an indicator by reference to where it may be “viewable,” without more,                         
              would not distinguish over the Roadmap phone.  An indicator on the back of the                                 
              handset could be viewed from the front of the handset by indirect means, such as by an                         
              image reflected from a mirror.                                                                                 























                                                             -5-                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007