The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JAMES R. JOHNSON __________ Appeal No. 2001-1763 Application 08/899,434 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 8 and 12.1 Claims 9 through 11 and 13 through 15, the only other claims pending in this application, stand allowed by the examiner (Brief, page 3; 1 Appellant’s amendment subsequent to the final rejection, amending claim 15, has been entered by the examiner and obviates the final rejection of claims 1-3 and 8-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶2 (see the amendment dated Sep. 7, 2000, Paper No. 16, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Sep. 22, 2000, Paper No. 18). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007