Appeal No. 2001-1815 Application 08/924,865 the view of the camera. Also within the view of the camera at angle of view B is the edge 191 of the overhead structure 190. See page 6 of Appellant’s specification. Conventionally, camera positioning systems contain one or more “stops” as to the extent of rotation of the camera, to prevent the camera’s field of view from extending significantly into areas having no useful security information. If such a stop were employed, the field of view at angle of view B could be considered optimal with regard to the amount of useful security information at this angle of view, because only a minimal portion of the overhead structure 190 is present in the field of view. See page 8 of Appellant’s specification. As the angle of view changes, the stops which limit the rotation of the camera are set to effect the appropriate lines of sight. For example, in figure 1, the stops will be set to lines of sight L and L’, respectively when the camera is set to angles of views B and C. See page 9 of Appellant’s specification. Figure 4 shows a flowchart for dynamically adjusting a camera positioning stop limit based upon a geometric model. The determination of the stop corresponding to a particular angle of view can be accomplished algorithmically or empirically. The 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007