Appeal No. 2001-1815 Application 08/924,865 said camera positioning system comprising: means for adjusting said camera’s angle of view, means for adjusting said camera’s line of sight, said camera’s line of sight being limited at a predetermined stop, and means for determining said predetermined stop, said predetermined stop being determined in dependence upon said angle of view, such that at said predetermined stop, said perimeter edge of said field of view coincides with said bounding edge within said field of view. References The reference relied on by the Examiner is as follows: Oyashiki et al. (Oyashiki) 5,808,670 Sept. 15, 1998 (Filed Sept. 6, 1995) Rejection at Issue Claims 1 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Oyashiki. OPINION With full consideration being given to the subject matter on appeal, the Examiner’s rejection and the arguments of Appellant and Examiner, for the reasons stated infra, we reverse the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007