Ex Parte BENASH et al - Page 7

              Appeal No. 2001-1851                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/815,363                                                                               

              arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused consideration by the                  
              Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, unless good cause is shown.”) and                             
              § 1.192(c)(8)(iv) (the brief must point out the errors in the rejection).                                


                                                   CONCLUSION                                                          
                     The rejection of claims 25-29 and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.  The                      
              rejection of claims 1-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.  The examiner’s decision in                  
              rejecting claims 1-29 and 31 is thus affirmed-in-part.                                                   























                                                          -7-                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007