Ex Parte MORRIS - Page 3




             Appeal No. 2001-1874                                                                                     
             Application No. 09/072,758                                                                               

             Kramer                                    5,998,780                   Dec.  7, 1999                      
                                                                            (filed Feb. 26, 1998)                     
             K. Aizawa et al. (Aizawa), On Sensor Image Compression For High Pixel Rate Imaging,                      
             Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/SICE/RSJ International Conference on Multisensor                            
             Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, pp. 201-207 (1996).                                      
             S. Kawahito et al. (Kawahito), CMOS image sensors with video compression, Design                         
             Automation Conference 1998, Proceedings of the ASP-DAC '98, Asia and South                               
             Pacific, pp. 595-600 (Feb. 1998).                                                                        
                    Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Aizawa.                    
                    Claims 1-3, 8, 9, 11-14, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being                     
             anticipated by Brajovic.                                                                                 
                    Claims 15 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                       
             over Aizawa and Kawahito.                                                                                
                    Claims 15-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                      
             Brajovic and Kawahito.                                                                                   
                    Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable Brajovic                      
             and Kramer.                                                                                              
                    Claims 10 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                       
             over Brajovic and Horn.                                                                                  
                    Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                         
             Brajovic and Standley.                                                                                   
                    Claims 5-7 have been objected to as depending from rejected base claim 1.                         



                                                         -3-                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007