The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KARL HAKAN TORBJORN GARDENFORS, SVEN MATTISSON, and JACOBUS CORNELIS HAARTSEN ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1912 Application No. 08/803,392 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-6, 11, 12, 23, and 25-27. We affirm-in-part.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007