Ex Parte ALBERT et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           

                                                       Paper No. 22                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              Ex parte JONATHAN D. ALBERT,                            
                         BARRETT COMISKEY, JOSEPH M. JACOBSON,                        
                              LIBING ZHANG, ANDREW LOXLEY,                            
                              ROBERT FEENEY, PAUL DRZAIC,                             
                                    and IAN MORRISON                                  
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 2001-1966                               
                              Application 09/140,846                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   

          Before THOMAS, FLEMING and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's              
          final rejection of claims 1-37.  Representative claims 1 and 30             
          are reproduced below:                                                       



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007