Appeal No. 2001-2042
Application No. 09/025,006
Upon return of this application, the examiner is advised to review those prior art
references cited in Kaschmitter, column 1, lines 25-40 to determine whether they, together with
Kaschmitter, affect the patentability of the claimed subject matter.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, we reverse the examiner’s Section 103 rejections and
remand this application to the examiner to determine the patentability of the claimed subject
matter therein based on the above-mentioned prior art references.
This application, by virtue of its “special” status, requires an immediate action. Manual
of Patent Examining Procedure § 708.01 (7th ed., rev. 1, February 2000). It is important that the
Board be informed promptly of any action affecting the appeal in this case.
REVERSED/REMANDED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
THOMAS WALTZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
ROMULO DELMENDO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CKP/dal
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007