The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KANGHOON LEE
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2106
Application No. 08/856,1831
____________
HEARD: JANUARY 7, 2003
____________
Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 and 2. Claims 3-20 are withdrawn from
consideration as drawn to a non-elected invention.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellant’s invention is directed to a computer program for
controlling a printer using Java language to interpret page-
layout requests. The printer receives Java print requests via a
1 Application for patent filed May 14, 1997, which claims priority
benefit under 35 U.S.C. from provisional Application 60/017,398, filed May 14,
1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007