The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALEXANDER USKOLOVSKY
and ALEXANDER ROZENBAUM
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2110
Application No. 09/095,462
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 25-36, which are all of the claims pending in the present
application. Claims 1-24 have been canceled. An amendment filed
April 21, 2000 after final rejection was denied entry by the
Examiner.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and device for
assisting in avoiding traffic accidents and violations. An onboard
digital camera is positioned in a vehicle and continuously provides
images of the vehicle surroundings. The captured images are
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007