Appeal No. 2001-2110
Application No. 09/095,462
which takes a photograph of, for example, an accident after it
occurs. Such a system is in clear contrast to the system in Secor
which is designed to provide continuous rear and side views of
vehicle surroundings to aid a driver while driving an automobile.
Given the disparity of problems addressed by the applied prior art
references, and the differing solutions proposed by them, it is our
view that any attempt to combine them in the manner proposed by the
Examiner could only come from Appellants’ own disclosure and not
from any teaching or suggestion in the references themselves.
In conclusion, we have not sustained any of the Examiner’s
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejections of the claims on appeal.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007