Appeal No. 2001-2212
Application No. 09/019,409
out how the claims patentably distinguish over the prior art does
not comply with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(8) and does not amount to a
separate argument for patentability. In re Nielson, 816 F.2d 1567,
1572, 2 USPQ2d 1525,1528 (Fed. Cir. 1987).
In conclusion, we have sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of each of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the
decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-3, 6, 7, and 12-20 is
affirmed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007