Ex Parte GOSS et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication and is not                       
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                       Paper No. 13                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                        Ex parte STEVEN N. GOSS, GARY M. KING                         
                          JEFFREY P. KUBALA, JOHN C. NAGY,                            
                                DAVID H. SURMAN, and                                  
                                WENDELL W. WILKINSON                                  
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 2001-2348                                  
                               Application 08/927,222                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH,, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-15, which constitute              
          all the claims in the application.                                          
          The disclosed invention pertains to an information                          
          handling system and method in which one or more requesters issue            
          requests to a request handler executing on a processor resource.            

                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007