Appeal No. 2001-2348 Application 08/927,222 of Nitta discussed above, the examiner’s rejection of claims 7, 12 and 14 fails to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. In summary, we have not sustained either of the examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-15 is reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/dal -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007