The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MAY TOM-MOY, THOMAS P. DOHERTY, RICHARD L. BAER, and DARLENE J. SPIRA-SOLOMON __________ Appeal No. 2001-2521 Application No. 08/738,464 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-14, all of the claims in the application. Claim 1 is representative and reads as follows: 1. A method for determining the presence or quantity of a preselected analyte in a flowing liquid stream which contains or is suspected of containing the analyte, which method comprises: (a) continuously contacting the flowing liquid stream with an on-line system which comprises: (i) a piezoelectric surface wave sample device comprising a receptor layer attached to the surface thereof wherein the receptor layer consistsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007