Appeal No. 2001-2627 Application No. 09/472,658 Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the Examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the1 respective details thereof. OPINION With full consideration being given to the subject matter on appeal, the Examiner's rejection and the arguments of Appellant and the Examiner, for the reasons stated infra, we reverse the Examiner's rejection of claims 1 through 21 and 56 through 60 and we affirm the Examiner's rejection of claims 22, 23, 25 through 28, 31 through 46, 50 through 55 and 61 through 65. 35 U.S.C. § 101 REJECTION We now turn to the rejection of claims 34 through 46 and 50 through 55 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being directed to non- statutory subject matter. At the outset, we note that the Appellant states on page 6 of the brief that Group I includes claims 34 through 46 and Group II includes claims 50 through 55. We note the Appellant has argued claims 34 through 46 as a singlePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007