Ex Parte HELLUMS et al - Page 7




            Appeal No. 2001-2694                                                                       
            Application No. 09/103,704                                                                 


            noise signal during the simulation in either a time-voltage or a                           
            time-current pair corresponding to appellants’ “summing device.”                           
                  The examiner further points out, again, that Bolcato teaches                         
            adding noise sources in parallel and relies on the desirability                            
            of replacing circuit elements in a simulation with corresponding                           
            circuit elements having added noise sources in parallel.  It is                            
            the examiner’s position that such a set of noise sources in                                
            parallel, if added to Popescu’s system “would then include a                               
            stochastic noise source associated with each circuit element that                          
            would add the generated noise current with the deterministic                               
            current values associated with each circuit element” (answer,                              
            pages 7-8), concluding that a “simulation using [sic] made by the                          
            system of Popescu with noise elements added in parallel as                                 
            illustrated by Bolcato would have increased accuracy and would                             
            better model the noise process in an actual circuit” (answer,                              
            page 8).                                                                                   
                  After reviewing the references and the arguments by                                  
            appellants and the examiner, we will not sustain the rejection of                          
            claims 1-9 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 because it is simply not                           
            clear to us that the references disclose what the examiner                                 
            contends they disclose.                                                                    



                                                 -7-                                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007