The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MATTHEW P. MITCHELL _____________ Appeal No. 2002-0064 Application No. 09/084,042 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Matthew P. Mitchell appeals from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-12. Claims 13-20, the only other claims currently pending in the application, have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not being readable on the elected invention. Appellant’s invention pertains to an improved regenerator comprising a plurality of separate concentric foil layers. A copy of the appealed claims appears in the appendix to appellant’s main brief.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007