Ex Parte MITCHELL - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                            Paper No. 21              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                            Ex parte MATTHEW P. MITCHELL                              
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2002-0064                                  
                             Application No. 09/084,042                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Matthew P. Mitchell appeals from the examiner’s final                  
          rejection of claims 1-12.  Claims 13-20, the only other claims              
          currently pending in the application, have been withdrawn from              
          further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not being            
          readable on the elected invention.                                          
               Appellant’s invention pertains to an improved regenerator              
          comprising a plurality of separate concentric foil layers.  A               
          copy of the appealed claims appears in the appendix to                      
          appellant’s main brief.                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007