Appeal No. 2002-0097
Application No. 09141,088
page 2 of the principal brief, all claims will stand or fall
together.
It is the examiner’s position that Scherpbier discloses the
claimed subject matter but for the generation of a message to the
at least first and second client computers, the message including
the URL of the document to be viewed at the at least first and
second computers and the transmission of the message to the at
least first and second client computers, the URL included in the
message to be used by each of the at least first and second
client computer to retrieve and display the document to be
viewed.
The examiner turns to Anupam for a teaching of a
collaborative web browsing system wherein the server transmits
the URL of a web page to all participants to be used by the
participants to retrieve the web page, citing column 1, line 19 -
column 2, line 7 of Anupam.
The examiner concludes therefrom that it would have been
obvious to incorporate the method of sending the second computer
the URL, as taught by Anupam, into the collaboration system of
Scherpbier “in order to provide flexibility of a collaboration
system by allowing each participant to ‘pull’ web pages from
-5–
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007