Appeal No. 2002-0097 Application No. 09141,088 computer and, therefore, Anupam cannot teach such a message addressed to “the at least first and second client computers,” as claimed. Accordingly, since there appears to be no reason for the artisan to have combined the applied references and, even if so combined, the instant claimed subject matter does not appear to be obtained, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-5, 7-9 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The examiner’s decision is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ERROL A. KRASS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EK/RWK -8–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007