The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LANI S. KANGAS, MIECZYSLAW H. MAZUREK, KURT C. MELANCOM, WALTER R. ROMANKO, and AUDREY A. SHERMAN ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0250 Application No. 08/930,771 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1, and 3-13, 15-17, and 19. The only other claims pending in the application, claims 14 and 18, are not subject to rejection. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007