Ex Parte KRAFT et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2002-0321                                                        
          Application No. 09/014,729                                                  

               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a method of               
          fabricating an electronic device on a semiconductor substrate.              
          The method comprises forming the following consecutive layers on            
          a gate insulator:  (1) a silicon-containing layer, (2) a layer of           
          titanium and nitride, (3) a tungsten layer, and (4) a silicon and           
          nitride layer.  Each of the layers are consecutively etched                 
          including, finally, the exposed portion of the silicon-containing           
          layer.  According to appellants, "[a]n advantage of the invention           
          is providing a highly selective etch that allows for long                   
          overetches necessary for severe wafer topography" (page 2 of                
          Brief, third paragraph).                                                    
               Appealed claims 10-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103             
          as being unpatentable over Agnello in view of Wu.  Claims 16 and            
          17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable               
          over the stated combination of references further in view of                
          Autryve.                                                                    
               We have thoroughly reviewed the respective positions                   
          advanced by appellants and the examiner.  In so doing, it is our            
          judgment that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie            
          case of obviousness for the claimed subject matter.  Accordingly,           
          for essentially those reasons expressed by appellants, we will              
          not sustain the examiner's rejections.                                      

                                         -3-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007