Ex Parte SULLIVAN et al - Page 3


               Appeal No. 2002-0322                                                                                              
               Application 08/681,870                                                                                            

                      Rather than reiterate the respective positions advanced by the examiner and appellants,                    
               we refer to the examiner’s answer and to appellants’ brief and reply brief for a complete                         
               exposition thereof.                                                                                               
                                                            Opinion                                                              
                      As an initial matter, we must interpret claims 1, 9 and 10, mindful that we must give the                  
               language thereof the broadest reasonable interpretation in light of the specification as it would be              
               interpreted by one of ordinary skill in this art.  See, e.g., In re Hyatt, 211 F.3d 1367, 1372,                   
               54 USPQ2d 1664, 1667 (Fed. Cir. 2000); In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054-55, 44 USPQ2d                            
               1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321-22, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed.                        
               Cir. 1989).  In doing so, the limitations of the specification, or any preferred embodiment or                    
               example therein, will not be read into the claims.  See generally, Zletz, supra; In re Priest,                    
               582 F.2d 33, 37, 199 USPQ 11, 15 (CCPA 1978); In re Prater, 415 F.2d 1393, 1404-05,                               
               162 USPQ 541, 550-51 (CCPA 1969).                                                                                 
                      The appealed claims are drawn to a golf ball having a core and cover.  In appealed claim                   
               1, the cover “comprises” at least about 10 to 100 parts of an ethylene copolymer “including up                    
               to” about 30% by weight of alkyl acrylate units, the ethylene copolymer being hydrolyzed and                      
               neutralized by a metal salt to some extent.  In appealed claim 10, the cover “comprises” at least                 
               about 10 to 100 parts of an ethylene copolymer “including up to” about 30% by weight of alkyl                     
               acrylate groups that have been hydrolyzed to the extent that about 5% to 90% of the “ester groups                 
               are neutralized with an alkali metal cation.”  We interpret the latter claim language to require that             
               the ester moieties of the alkyl acrylate units are hydrolyzed with an alkali metal salt such that the             
               resulting carboxylic acid moiety is neutralized with the alkali metal cation (see specification, e.g.,            
               page 6, lines 12-14).  As the examiner points out (answer, page 4), the hydrolization of the alkyl                
               acrylate moieties of the ethylene copolymer to the corresponding alcohol and the corresponding                    
               acid by an alkali metal salt wherein the acid moiety is simultaneously neutralized with the cation                
               of the alkali metal salt, is a well known reaction termed “saponification” in textbooks as well as                
               common and technical dictionaries,2 and does not result in free carboxylic acid moieties.                         

                                                                                                                                
               2  See, e.g., The Condensed Chemical Dictionary 909 (10th ed., Gessner G. Hawley, ed., New                        
               York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1981).                                                                       

                                                          - 3 -                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007