Ex Parte SULLIVAN et al - Page 12


               Appeal No. 2002-0322                                                                                              
               Application 08/681,870                                                                                            

                      As correctly pointed out by the examiner at page 2 of the answer, A[a]ppellants have                       
               stipulated that claims 1-15 should stand or fall together.@  See page 3 of the brief.  Also, see 37               
               CFR ' 1.192(c)(7) and (c)(8) (2000) and In re McDaniel, 293 F.3d 1379, 1383, 63 USPQ2d                            
               1462, 1465 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (Aif the brief fails to meet either requirement, the Board is free to                 
               select a single claim from each group of claims subject to a common ground of rejection as                        
               representative of all claims in that group and to decide the appeal of that rejection based solely on             
               the selected representative claim@).  Consequently, I would have chosen one representative claim,                 
               for example, claim 1.  However, the majority has chosen to select three representative claims for                 
               less than compelling reasons from my point of view.  In so doing and based on an incorrect                        
               analysis form my perspective, the majority has decided to reverse the examiner=s rejection with                   
               respect to claim 9.                                                                                               
               According to the majority, this is so because the composition disclosed in Horiuchi Adoes not                     
               contain an unsaponified ethylene copolymer and an unneutralized acid copolymer, and there is no                   
               disclosure that the cover further includes a metal salt@.  Of those listed items, claim 9 only                    
               specifies a metal salt and an ethylene copolymer, which copolymer is open as to what degree, if                   
               any, that it may have been saponified, neutralized or hydrolyzed.  In this regard, it is noted that               
               the language Athe acid copolymer comprising about 0 to 90 parts by weight of the overall                          
               composition@ as appears in claim 9 leaves claim 9 open to the presence of no acid polymer that                    
               includes Aabout 1% to about 30% acrylic acid@ as a separate component of the claimed cover.                       
               Horiuchi discloses a cover that includes an ethylene copolymer in the specified amount (SA420)                    
               and a metal salt (any of the Hi-milan ionomer resins comprise a metal salt).  See Table 1,                        
               examples 1 and 2 of Horiuchi.                                                                                     


                                                         - 12 -                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007