Ex Parte DEBELIUS - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2002-0354                                                          Page 2              
            Application No. 09/293,455                                                                        


                   The appellant's electric motor (14) includes an armature shaft (42), which is              
            retained at one end by a retainer (100).  Figure 2 of his specification shows that the            
            retainer (100) fits within an enlarged portion (84) of a central bore (82) of a bearing (80).     
            More specifically, the retainer (100) seats on a shoulder (86) of the bearing to register         
            the bearing (80) and a commutator (50).                                                           


                   A further understanding of the invention can be achieved by reading the following          
            claim.                                                                                            
                   1. An armature shaft comprising:                                                           
                         a shaft having two ends;                                                             
                         a commutator on said shaft;                                                          
                         at least one bearing on said shaft, said bearing adjacent one of                     
                   said ends of said shaft, said bearing having a central bore sized to                       
                   support said shaft during rotation, said central bore having an enlarged                   
                   portion opening towards said one end of said shaft; and                                    
                         a retainer on said shaft for retaining said bearing on said shaft, said              
                   retainer positioned within said enlarged bore portion of said bearing.                     


                   Claims 1-4, 7-11, 14-18, and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
            obvious over U.S. Patent No. 3,624,434 (“Dafler”) and U.S. Patent No. 4,801,252                   
            (“Wrobel”).  Claims 6, 13, and 20 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Dafler,           
            Wrobel, and U.S. Patent No. 3,829,722 (“Rosenthal”).                                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007