Ex Parte WICKS et al - Page 4





              Appeal No. 2002-0410                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/802,575                                                                                  



              teaching of storing message data and locating data, we find it unreasonable to                              

              extrapolate this operational data to reach the conclusion that any message containing                       

              data from a stored database and communicated to a specific subscriber by a processor                        

              would have been obvious.1   This would require us to speculate, which we decline to do.                     

                     Additionally, appellants argue that the message data stored in Wang is not a                         

              database.  (See brief at pages 8-9).  We agree with appellants and find that the request                    

              for transmission of a page and the associated message data is not a database and                            

              would not in our opinion have fairly suggested the storage and use of or compiling of a                     

              “bargain information database.”  Therefore, the examiner has not set forth a prima                          

              facie case of obviousness of the claimed invention, and we cannot sustain the rejection                     

              of independent claims 1 and 9 and their dependent claims 2-8 and 10-18.                                     








                     1  While we do agree with the examiner that the breadth of the method claim is quite broad, and      
              we do find it quite well know that many shoppers have networked and spread the word of bargains so as       
              to get the great deals, the examiner has provided no such evidence that the type of methodology or a        
              similar methodology has been reduced to a tangible technological based system using a database and a        
              processor whether the mode of notice is phone, page, email or traditional paper mail.  The examiner has     
              cited and expressly stated that the Champion, III et al. patent (4,812,843) has not been applied against the
              claims.  Therefore, we have not relied upon this teaching.  From our review of the abstract of the          
              Champion, III et al. patent we note that the patent teaches that “[t]he system provides information . . .   
              which may be of interest to a subscriber including airline flight and related travel and stock information.”
              The system “ automatically provides the subscriber with updated information concerning changes in status    
              or condition.”  Additionally, we note that the examiner has not indicated any search in class 705, which is 
              directed to many of the automated business methods.  Upon return of the case to the examiner, the           
              examiner should consider a search in this area.                                                             
                                                            4                                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007