The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HOMER ANTONIADIS,
MICHAEL INBASEKARAN,
and
EDMUND P. WOO
__________
Appeal No. 2002-0429
Application No. 08/847,138
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 30-32. Claim 1 has been canceled and claims
2-29 are allowed. Thus, only claims 30-32 are before us on this
appeal.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM
30. An OLED comprising:
a cathode comprising a first conductive layer;
an electroluminescent layer comprising an oxadiazole,
thiadiazole or triazole compound, said oxadiazole, thiadiazole or
triadiazole compound emitting light when holes and electrons
recombine therein;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007