The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte KNUT KESSEL, GUNSTER SCHERR, MICHAEL KLUGE, NORBERT BIEDERMANN, THOMAS GREINDL, THOMAS BOGENSTRATTER, and WOLFGANG HAHNLEIN __________ Appeal No. 2002-0439 Application No. 09/391,384 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges. MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-7, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal and reads as follows: 1. In a process for the preparation of creatine or creatine monohydrate by reaction of sodium or potassium sarcosinate with cyanamide at a temperature of from 20 to 150°C and a pH from 7.0 to 14.0, the improvement which comprises carrying out the pH adjustment with carbonic acid.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007