Appeal No. 2002-0489
Application 08/831,731
Claim 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips, further in view of MC141622.
Claims 7, 9, and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
over Philips, further in view of MC44144.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips, further in view of Rogers and Romesburg.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips, Rogers, and Romesburg, further in view of Brown.
Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips, further in view of Brown.
Claims 16-18, 20, 21, 23, 27-29, 40-43 and 53-57 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Philips and Burrows.
Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips and Burrows, further in view of MC141622.
Claims 22 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
over Philips and Burrows, further in view of MC44144.
Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips and Burrows, further in view of Rogers and Romesburg.
Claim 26 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips, Burrows, Rogers, and Romesburg, further in view of
Brown.
Claims 37-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Philips.
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007