Ex Parte SPITZ et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0503                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/089,698                                                  


                    1.  An ink jet print cartridge structure comprising a             
               substrate holder for mounting thereon one or more                      
               semiconductor substrates, the substrate holder having a top            
               surface having a perimeter and containing one or more                  
               substrate locator wells, each well having a plurality of               
               well walls and a well base, each well base including at                
               least one ink feed slot therein, the holder including one or           
               more chambers on an opposing side of the substrate holder              
               from the locator well, each chamber being in flow                      
               communication with a corresponding substrate locator well,             
               the holder also containing side walls attached to the top              
               surface along the perimeter thereof, wherein one or more of            
               the side walls contain fins for convectively removing heat             
               from the substrate holder.                                             
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Watanabe et al. (Watanabe)         4,689,659      Aug. 25, 1987             
          Ta et al. (Ta)                     4,755,836      Jul. 05, 1988             
          Fukuda et al. (Fukuda)             5,066,964      Nov. 19, 1991             
          Drake et al. (Drake)               5,079,189      Jan. 07, 1992             
          Wong                               5,084,713      Jan. 28, 1992             
          Wenzel et al. (Wenzel)             5,426,458      Jun. 20, 1995             
          Oda et al. (Oda)                   5,552,816      Sep. 03, 1996             
          Cook                               5,834,689      Nov. 10, 1998             
                                                 (filed Dec. 02, 1993)               
               Claims 1, 4, 5 and 10-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Oda in view of Watanabe.  Claims           
          2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       
          unpatentable over Oda in view of Watanabe and Fukuda.  Claims 6             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007