Appeal No. 2002-0503 Page 3
Application No. 09/089,698
and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Oda in view of Watanabe and Wenzel. Claim 8 stands rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Oda in view of
Watanabe and Drake. Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Oda in view of Watanabe and
Cook. Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Oda in view of Watanabe and Ta. Claims 14, 17
and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Oda in view of Watanabe and Ta. Claims 15 and 16 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Oda in
view of Watanabe, Ta and Fukuda. Claims 19 and 20 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Oda in view of
Watanabe, Ta and Wenzel. Claim 21 stands rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Oda in view of
Watanabe, Ta and Drake. Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Oda in view of Watanabe, Ta
and Cook. Claims 25-28 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Oda in view of Watanabe, Ta,
Fukuda and Wong. Claims 29 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Oda in view of Watanabe, Ta,
Fukuda, Wong and Wenzel.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007