The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law journal
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte WALTER SIEGL and ANDREAS HELFENSTEIN
Appeal No. 2002-0585
Application No. 09/088,307
HEARD: February 5, 2003
Before KRASS, RUGGIERO and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 2-12 and 21-32. Claims 13-20 are considered by the
examiner as being directed to allowable subject matter and are no
longer part of this appeal.
The invention is directed to the control of a printing press
having a plurality of print positions. Each position prints a
-1–
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007