Appeal No. 2002-0585
Application No. 09/088,307
PIDs were old and well known does not, per se, make it obvious,
within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 103, to provide for such a PID
controller or a change in controller parameters in a web-fed
rotary printing press, as claimed.
CONCLUSION
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 2-12 and 21-30
under either 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, or under 35 U.S.C.
103. We have, however, sustained the rejection of claims 31 and
32 under 35 U.S.C. 103.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.
-11–
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007