The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte HERBERT M. REYNOLDS, ROBERT KERR,
RAYMOND BRODEUR, KHALDOUN RAYES,
DOUGLAS NEAL and YUNTAO CUI
_______________
Appeal No. 2002-0586
Application 08/949,213
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WALTZ, DELMENDO and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims
1 to 6, 8 to 10 and 12 to 32.1,2 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
CITED REFERENCE
1 According to Appellants, claims 7 and 11 contain allowable subject matter. (Brief, p. 2).
2 In rendering our decision we have considered Appellants’ position present in the Brief,
filed July 23, 2001 and the Reply Brief, filed October 01, 2001.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007