Appeal No. 2002-0586
Application 08/949,213
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1 to 6, 8 to 10, 12 to 17, and 19 to 32 as unpatentable under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
obvious over Kaptur; and claim 18 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
over Kaptur are reversed.
REVERSED
)
THOMAS A. WALTZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY T. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JTS/kis
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS, P.C.
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007