Ex Parte KANDIL et al - Page 5


                 Appeal No.  2002-0616                                                         Page 5                    
                 Application No.  08/693,052                                                                             

                        Richards teaches adjuvant effects are additive or synergistic, and                               
                        results in the strongest immunization antibody response when                                     
                        compared to adjuvants being used alone.  Masihi also teaches                                     
                        combining adjuvants resulted in better protection against lethal                                 
                        influenza challenge, and the effectiveness of MPL adjuvant with                                  
                        influenza hemagglutinin subunit vaccine.  . . . .  One skilled in the                            
                        art would have been motivated to combine a mineral salt adjuvant                                 
                        with a second adjuvant for additive and synergistic effect for use in                            
                        a vaccine formulation with a reasonable expectation of success.                                  
                        The use of adjuvants was well-known in the art.  Combining                                       
                        adjuvants for enhancing immunological responses was also well                                    
                        known in the art, as evidenced by the applied prior art.  All claimed                            
                        adjuvants were known immunoadjuvants.  Absent of evidence to                                     
                        the contrary, appellants’ claimed invention would have been prima                                
                        facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the                             
                        instant invention in view of the teachings of the prior art applied                              
                        herein with a reasonable expectation of success.                                                 
                 Id. at 7-8.                                                                                             
                        Appellants argue there is no motivation provided in the references to                            
                 combine a glycosylamide, an octadecyl ester of an aromatic amino acid, or a                             
                 lipopeptide adjuvant with a mineral salt adjuvant as required by the claimed                            
                 invention, and Stünkel and Penney suggests using the adjuvants they describe                            
                 in the place of mineral salt adjuvants.  See Appeal Brief, page 7.  Thus,                               
                 appellants conclude that the invention of the claims is not disclosed or                                
                 suggestion by the combination of references relied upon.  See id. at 8.  We                             
                 agree.                                                                                                  
                        “In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner bears the initial                       
                 burden of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness.  Only if that burden is                         
                 met, does the burden of coming forward with evidence or argument shift to the                           
                 applicant.”  In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir.                        
                 1993).                                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007