Appeal No. 2002-0652 Application No. 08/465,072 constitute "manufactures" (and hence "products") because the signals are physical things made by the disclosed circuits. The three product classes of statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (machine, manufacture, and composition of matter) have traditionally required physical structure or matter. While the specification discloses things, such as computers, memory chips, wires, etc., which are products, the claim language does not read on these things. No tangible physical structure is made in response to information as recited in the claims. We also disagree with the argument that "signals" are a "manufacture" and hence a product. A signal, while physical in the sense that it can be measured, does not have a tangible physical structure and does not fall within any of the statutory categories. See In re Bonczyk, No. 01-1061 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2001) (unpublished) ("fabricated energy structure" does not correspond to any statutory category of subject matter and it is unnecessary to reach the alternate ground of affirmance that the subject matter lacks practical utility). A "composition of matter" "covers all compositions of two or more substances and includes all composite articles, whether they be results of chemical union, or of mechanical mixture, or whether they be gases, fluids, powders or solids." Shell Development Co. v. Watson , 149 F. Supp. 279, 280, 113 USPQ 265, 266 (D.D.C. 1957), aff'd, 252 F.2d 861, 116 USPQ 27Page: Previous 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007