Appeal No. 2002-0699 Application No. 09/401,740 carboxaldehyde, phenanthrene carboxaldehyde, 2-fluorenecarboxaldehyde, poly ((phenyl glycidyl ether)-co-formaldehyde), poly ((@-cresyl glycidyl ether)-co- formaldehyde), poly (D-toluenesulfonamide-co-formaldehyde), or mixtures thereof. REFERENCES The examiner relies on the following prior art reference: Ball 4,684,956 Aug. 4, 1987 Bruder et al. (Bruder) 5,015,292 May 14, 1991 Yaegashi et al. (Yaegashi) 5,270,730 Dec. 14, 1993 Takazawa et al. (Takazawa) 5,279,655 Jan. 18, 1994 Tobias et al. (Tobias) 5,286,288 Feb. 15, 1994 Fujioka 5,397,388 Mar. 14, 1995 Wickramanayake 5,531,816 Jul. 2, 1996 Malhotra et al. (Malhotra ‘390) 5,902,390 May 11, 1999 Malhotra et al. (Malhotra ‘117) 5,922,117 Jul. 13, 1999 Nishizaki et al. (Nishizaki) 6,022,910 Feb. 8, 2000 Shawcross et al. (Shawcross) 6,028,180 Feb. 22, 2000 Breton et al. (Breton ‘607) 6,045,607 Apr. 4, 2000 Breton et al. (Breton ‘599) 6,106,599 Aug. 22, 2000 Shimomura 06-228476 Aug. 16, 1994 (Published Japanese Patent Application) REJECTIONS The appealed claims stand rejected as follows: (1) Claims 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 through 14, 16, 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as unpatentable over the disclosure of Takazawa; (2) Claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Takazawa and Nishizaki; (3) Claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007