Appeal No. 2002-0699 Application No. 09/401,740 combined disclosures of Takazawa and Tobias; (4) Claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Takazawa and Ball; (5) Claims 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Takazawa, Yaegashi, Wickramanayake, Malhotra ‘117 and Breton ‘599; (6) Claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Takazawa, Shawcross and Bruder; (7) Claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Takazawa, Shimomura, Yaegashi and Malhotra ‘390; (8) Claims 1 through 5, 7 through 9, 13 and 18 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Breton ‘607, Takazawa, Ball and Fujioka; (9) Claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Breton ‘607, Takazawa, Ball, Fujioka and Tobias; (10) Claims 10 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Breton ‘607, Takazawa, Ball and Fujioka, Yaegashi and Wickramanayake; and (11) Claims 16 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Breton ‘607, Takazawa, Ball, 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007