Ex Parte Ko et al - Page 6

          Appeal No. 2002-0702                                                         
          Application No. 09/711,324                                                   

               For the above stated reasons, we hereby sustain the                     
          examiner’s § 103 rejection of claims 1-38 as being unpatentable              
          over Ding in view of Bosch.3                                                 
               The decision of the examiner is affirmed.                               
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                      
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                     
          § 1.136(a).                                                                  
                                       AFFIRMED                                        


                         EDWARD C. KIMLIN               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         BRADLEY R. GARRIS              )   APPEALS AND                
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         TERRY J. OWENS                 )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
          vsh                                                                          



               3 A discussion of the Bosch reference is unnecessary in light of our    
          disposition of this appeal.                                                  
                                          6                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007