Appeal No. 2002-0796 Page 15 Application No. 09/110,994 CONCLUSION The examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-5, 10-13 and 16-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combination of Petrenko, Ivanenkov and Sparks is affirmed. But because the examiner failed to set forth a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the remaining claims, claims 3, 6-9, 14 and 15, the rejection as to those claims is reversed. AFFIRMED-IN-PART; REVERSED-IN-PART Demetra J. Mills ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007