Appeal No. 2002-0816 Application No. 09/442,895 Page 12 number of FG segments, the more accurate the rotor speed may be determined. From these disclosures of Carrier, we find that an artisan would have been taught to make the circumferentially disposed magnets 6 and 7 of Shirakawa as plural segments having alternately polarized axially directed fields, i.e., each of the segments is magnetized with a polarity that is opposite from adjacent segments. We are not persuaded by appellant’s assertion, (brief, page 4) to the effect that the examiner has combined an excessive number of references, i.e., three references in an attempt to meet a “relatively simple structure.” We agree with the examiner (answer, page 11) that “reliance on a large number of references in a rejection does not, without more, weigh against the obviousness of the claimed invention. See In re Gorman, 933 F.2d 982, 18 USPQ2d 1885 (Fed. Cir. 1991). ” In addition, we are unpersuaded by appellant’s assertion (brief, page 4) that Carrier relates to a rather different type of machine, wherein the outer housing rotates about a fixed armature. We agree with the examiner (answer, page 11 and 12) that if combined, the spaced magnets 32 of Carrier would be disposed radially inwardly of the inner periphery of the armature windings, because the existing magnet 7 would be formed of aPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007