The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HAJIME WATANABE and MASASHIGE KIMURA __________ Appeal No. 2002-0863 Application No. 08/770,039 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before KRASS, BARRETT and Moore, Administrative Patent Judges. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 7-18 and 21-23. Claims 1-6, 19-20, and 22 have been canceled. Thus, claims 7-18, 21 and 23 are before us on appeal. REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM The appellants have indicated that claims 7-18 and 21 stand or fall together, and that claim 23 stands or falls apart. Accordingly, we shall focus our attention on claims 7 and 23, and the remaining claims will stand or fall together. Note In rePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007