Ex Parte WATANABE et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-0863                                                         
          Application No. 08/770,039                                                   
                                                                                      
               a timer; and                                                            
               a central processing unit (CPU) for controlling said second             
          switch based on input information from said first switch and                 
          information from said timer;                                                 
               wherein said CPU starts said timer and also turns on said               
          second switch to turn on said video light when turn-on of said               
          video light is instructed from said first switch, and, when a time           
          set on said timer expires, said CPU turns off said second switch             
          to turn off said video light; and                                            
               said video light is maintained in a turned-on state if said             
          CPU determines that a record/stop switch of said video camera is             
          on, by means of said CPU initializing said timer when it is                  
          determined that said record/stop switch is on, thereby preventing            
          said timer from expiring.                                                    

                                     The References                                    
               In rejecting the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), the                   
          examiner relies upon the following references:                               
          Sakai et al. (Sakai)          4,782,355            Nov. 01, 1988             
          Nishigaki et al. (Nishigaki) 5,130,741             Jul. 14, 1992             
          Goo et al. (Goo)             5,309,195            May  03, 1994             


                                     The Rejections                                    
               Claims 7-9, 13-15, 21 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Nishigaki in view of Goo and             
          Sakai.                                                                       
               Claims 10-12 and 16-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Nishigaki in view of Goo and             
          Sakai, and further in view of the conceded prior art.                        

                                          3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007